Sunday, November 11, 2012

Punished by the Fates

So I wrote this poem today while Dexter was napping:

At Barnes and Noble



I’ve taken my son out in public with a cold, 
and at any given time his nose is crusty
or oozing or both. When he coughs 

without covering his preschool mouth,
you can hear something wet echoing
in the dank cave of his chest. Even his eyes
are red and boggy. We’re in the kids’ section 

where there’s a train table and other boys
who are learning how shitty it is to share.
I brought sanitizer and I meant to ice
my son’s hands, but I didn’t. I guess I looked 

around and kind of said the hell with it.
Which is not to say that I don’t cry
about lost children. It was just that we couldn’t 

stay home any longer. You know how a mosquito 
can find your ear as you’re finally falling 
backwards into sleep? You know how
that one house fly keeps buzzing and thwacking 

against the pane, but you can never find it? 
Preschoolers make noises like that.
Not the same tonally, but the same
annoyingly. Which is not to say that I’d want
to crush my son like a bug I really love,
only that I wanted him to stop making the sounds 

he makes when he’s trapped in the house.
And not that I would want any harm to befall
the preschoolers who keep trying to take the train 

he’s peacefully running along the track, but I’m
a little too worn down to worry about mere 

rhinovirus, and if some pint-sized bully
wants to snatch that engine from my boy’s
germy hands? Well, it’s not exactly
a pox upon him. 


And then when he woke up from his nap, he puked on me four times. The poem's morality is questionable, but it was meant to be a little confessional and a little funny. I think the fates are punishing me for taking such an irreverent tone. I think this retribution, in the fluid form of vomit, was meant to remind me to never take my son's health for granted. There are other things one can be glib about.  

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Another Alternate Narrative


The Other Glass Menagerie

            It was acquired outside of Barney’s on the Upper East Side during a mild winter as shoppers dipped in and out of stores to gather Christmas gifts. Each tiny, glass animal— costing no more than a few dollars— was wrapped in a Kleenex, and the lot of them were packaged up in the type of box usually reserved for gifting necklaces. The menagerie consisted of both obvious and more unusual specimens: a clear and orange dog; a white and clear monkey (clutching, of course, a yellow banana); a red and clear hedgehog; a blue steer with orange horns; an exceptionally small yellow rooster with an even smaller orange cockscomb; a very scrappy orange and red chicken; and an owl, in shades of purple, yellow, and white, who, who, who measured slightly smaller than a girl’s thumb and was the largest of the bunch. And true to stereotype, he claimed to be the wisest of the collection, although each animal had its occasional moments of deep insight.
            For example, after the journey in a carry-on, after crossing the great expanse of the country in an overhead compartment, and after taking their place on a desk under a lamp set up to pass light through their varying transparencies, the animals began to speculate as to why this woman-child, someone who should so clearly be in a more advanced stage of social development, chose them and placed them in such close proximity to the activities of her life instead of on some distant shelf to collect dust in all their Lilliputian crevices. On one of those days when the rain hastens afternoon into evening, they tried to puzzle it out:
The Monkey waved his banana around and surmised to the group that it must be because each of them represented a joke frozen in that moment just after the eruption of laughter. The owl said, no, I’m not funny-looking. Speak for yourself.
The steer suggested that it was because their woman-child ran away from her shaky childhood, and they all nodded as they recalled how long the flight was between her childhood home and adult home. Yes, that could be it, they said.
The very scrappy chicken said, yes, but lots of girls and women like little, cute things. In fact, a lot of Japanese pop culture fetishizes cute. The group went silent for a moment, and then the rooster said since when did you become an expert on Japanese pop culture? and the group laughed at the chicken who said, but wait… haven’t you noticed that her  boyfriend has anime eyes? And the chicken widened her beady eyes.
No, no, no said the owl. This woman-child is a poet and because of that she loves things that are small and perfect. This made them all swell a little with pride to think they represented exquisiteness. They held on to that answer for a while.
After a while they stopped trying to figure out their woman-child who would select one of them at random and absent-mindedly turn the animal slowly in her warm, dry hands as she sat in front of the computer screen and scattered words across pages. Sometimes you just have to accept the mysteries of life, said the hedgehog in one of his Buddhist moments.
            Whatever the reason, the menagerie came to cherish their person, and they would try to do nice things for her when she wasn’t looking. The dog had heard a story once about how a shoemaker had shoe elves to help him with his cobbling, and she told the group the story one night over hot tea served in millet husks.
We should do something like that, said the rooster, so they thought and thought about what they would do.
The steer said, look, our woman-child doesn’t do a very good job keeping her spaces clean. I mean, she obviously tries to arrange her life, but even after everything is put in its place, dirt builds up in the dark places.
The hedgehog said, is that a metaphor for her mind?
The owl said, hush. I’m supposed to be the wise one. Let’s try to clean up those dirty, dark places, so the group gathered dog hair from the carpet and fashioned it into brooms and dusters. They tore the corners off the tissue peeking out of its box and used them as rags. Every night for a week they worked until exhaustion, just as the morning’s Midas touch turned the desk’s wood to gold. The trouble, they noticed, was twofold: The nature of their size made it hard for them to cover much ground so that by the time they finished cleaning one dark place, the dust began to settle again in another. The second problem was that the very nature of dark places meant the woman-child avoided them, so she never noticed when they seemed cleaner and more light-filled. After several days of disappointment and what would be bone weariness if they had bones, the menagerie gave up on their elven endeavors and decided that maybe they should just focus on what they do best: charm with glassy dinkiness.
            It wasn’t long after this failed attempt at becoming more useful that the woman-child began cleaning everything off her desk. The menagerie became despondent, and they each worried quietly that it was because of their collective failure that they were now being wrapped in tissues with missing corners and placed into the same necklace box that they arrived in a few years’ prior. The animals tried to talk it through with each other, but the tissue just muffled their words, so they all fell silent and became deeply depressed. In the next few days they heard dull, distant sounds like stifled thunder, and they suffered great vertigo as their necklace box was placed sideways in another box. They were in terrible limbo…
            And starved for air and wistful fondling. But sometime after a week or so (Time dragged on with no sense of night or day. It just seemed like a week, says the glass dog who, common to fleshier dogs, doesn't really have a great sense of time anyway.) the menagerie trembled in its box with collective anticipation as it felt the necklace box become righted. It was one of those great, inverted moments of magical irony when the necklace box was opened because instead of a gasp coming from the outside of the box as it usually does when a necklace box is opened with any kind of gasping, in this case the gasp came from inside of the box.
            So once again after much unwrapping of tissues, in a similar kind of anticipation akin to déjà vu, the glass animals were placed on the same desk under the same lamp set up to pass light through their same varying transparencies. Everything was the same except the monkey who lost his banana in transit when it snapped off during some particularly vigorous moving. He didn’t mind though, not much really. Now he felt a little more serious, like maybe he would finally get some respect. Everything was the same except for the view from the sliding glass doors, which, incidentally, were also a new feature for dog, steer, owl, monkey, chicken, rooster, and hedgehog. They spent a great deal of time gazing out of those doors at the woods beyond, watching the seasonal wheel alternately strip or adorn the crowding trees with a kaleidoscope of leaves.  
            By and large, this is how it went. The menagerie would become accustomed to their place on the desk with the view it afforded. The woman-child would turn each of them in her fingers as she transcribed the words of her heart, feeding them into a machine. The dust would begin to build up in the dark corners. The animals would begin to worry, and then the move would happen: Tissues, necklace box inside a bigger box, vertigo, jostling, breathless waiting, same desk, same light, new view. It almost became a joke; it most certainly became the norm. Sometimes it would be city lights through the window; sometimes it would be palm trees through the window, sometimes it would be deserted neighborhood streets greyed out by the soft crayon of rainfall.
            One night the glass animals gathered around the ambient glow cast by the computer monitor’s screen saver, and they pensively sipped their tea from their millet husks. The quiet persisted for a little while until the chicken piped up:
            Why do you suppose we move around so much? He asked the other thoughtful animals.
            I’m not sure, said the dog, but I think our woman-child is kind of rootless like one of those clingy air plants.
            No, said the owl, because sometimes we stay someplace for a long time, so really she’s more like a succulent with a shallow root structure.
            Give me a break, said the monkey, she’s not a plant.
            Personally, I don’t mind the moving, said the chicken. I like the change of scenery.
            Me, too, said the rooster, and besides, we still get our desk and lamp. Nothing really changes for us.
            But what is she running away from? said the steer.
            And the animals fell quiet again for a little while. They blew on their hot tea and sipped it gingerly. After a while of this, the hedgehog, who was really quite soft-spoken, cleared his throat and offered this: Our woman-child keeps moving so that she can cast a golden spell over the memory of place, just as it is for us who achingly look back at every place we’ve been. The only way to appreciate the fulsomeness of the view is to move far enough away from it. I hold those first trees in my mind like a shimmer dying across the lake as the sun dipped down behind those first mountains we ever beheld. One thing I can tell you, though, is that we are a constant comfort for her hands that like to wander. We are like the moon that seems to steady the driver even as she moves forward in space and time. So get a grip, you guys. Don’t overanalyze.
            With that, the animals let out a slow, musical sigh, and they each smiled a small, secret smile. Even the owl, who, who, who was usually egotistical about his intellect, had to acknowledge the monk-like wisdom of the hedgehog.   

Saturday, October 6, 2012

The Other Girl With The Dragon Tattoo


School has forced me to curtail my posting, but here is a short story (my first in a decade) that I wrote for class:


The Other Girl With The Dragon Tattoo

She has two dragons, actually, and they’re nearly identical except for small details in the faces as well as variations in color. The dragons cover the better part of her upper arms with tails that tendril down to her elbows, the bulk of the bodies squat on her shoulders, and the leathery wings, half raised in flight, wrap towards her back. The faces lick at her collar bones. Both dragons are more tribal than Chinese, and the left dragon, turquoise and black, breathes fire towards the center of her chest; the right dragon, red and black, breathes a swirl of ice towards her chest so that her heart seems to be the aim of their elements. A place to erupt with steam. The faces, in all their tribal abstraction, are ciphers.

The other girl with the dragon tattoos passes the parlor where her art was made just as the sun dips down below the Mission, and strumming Bolero badly, a man with a classical guitar disappears into the darkness of the eyeglass storefront. She hears the high-pitched whine of a tattoo gun while smokers cry uncle and pace during their break. Droplets of blood rise where needles are making a castle out of skin. It’s a cover-up, a fixer-up, really. Underneath was art from another life, something like a blackbird with mushy lines, dead and gone, layered over with something solid, like how he feels about his life now. Like it will stand for generations. The stones are only half-wrought, though, and the parapets are just a glimmer in the eye of the artist. The man with the half-built tattoo thinks he’ll finally be the king of his own castle, which will drape with his family’s crest. Maybe the sky will wheel with sooty bats, and the artist will use a little white to catch a few with moonlight.

Across town a koi fish is being wiped clean and wrapped in plastic. It looks as if it’s leaping out of the water and lifting off the man’s thigh. Some trick with shadows the artist learned as an apprentice in Kyoto. So now the man is the man with the koi tattoo, and the fish is as long as a fish story. The man with the koi tattoo greases up his fish every night until the last of the scabbing sloughs off. The scales are layered in twenty shades of gold, and when he catches his leg in the mirror he leaps out of himself and for a moment gasps, breathless. Koi, he learned, represent luck and courage. When you consider sixty days and no other needles, he thought, they’re pretty, slippery symbols. That’s a lot of beauty in an unseen place, the woman who came home with him said. As they slept, her hand rested firmly on his cool flank as if she could keep him from slipping back under the murky water.

In the next week the castle was made complete, and it covered his whole chest. The artist raised the flag and dropped the tapestry with the family crest over the edge with what looked like an everlasting flutter. The man said render the drawbridge open; I don’t want a castle that says keep out. But give me the moat, he said. Every castle needs a moat, so the artist carved a moat into his skin in shades of moss and deep blue. The man’s small right nipple shone like a rose-colored moon through the windows of the tower. The man’s left nipple wanted nothing to do with its role as queen of Scotland, waiting to be hanged, so it hovered above the castle, hung with a ring. The man with the castle tattoo is now the castle’s king.

The man with the castle tattoo leaves the parlor where his art was made just as the sun dips down below the Mission, and strumming Bolero badly, a man with a classical guitar disappears into the darkness of the eyeglass storefront. The king wanders down the sidewalk, a little sore, a little like his chest had been scratched open by a cat, past the cheap sushi joint where a man with a koi tattoo pays his check, thanks the waiter with the Kanji tattoo, and wanders out into a night just getting socked in with fog. And they’re just a block apart now, the men with their fresh tattoos, and they both head to the same apartment building just up by Dolores Park, and they can both hear the subway train’s long, keening stop. And they’re both just jingling their keys against the change in their pockets as they walk towards the same foyer.

Meanwhile, the girl with the dragon tattoos is making her last latte while the diners linger over half-eaten crullers. She wipes the wand and slips it into the milk, which must be cool to rise into froth. And the wand in the milk sends up a column of steam in front of her face as if the dragons finally gave fire- and ice-breathing their all. As if her heart finally blew off its heat. The windows of the café would look out on the park, but condensation and the inside lamps dangling over each table make them wet, black mirrors.

When the last coffee lover leaves, the girl with the dragon tattoos wipes down the espresso machine, puts up the chairs, shuts off the lights. She locks the front door on the way out and walks off to her apartment building under street lights that make the fog green. Down the road she can hear the long keen of the J Church breaks; up the road she can see her foyer littered with yesterday’s circulars for Safeway.

Later that night, the man with the castle tattoo, the man with the koi tattoo, and the girl with the dragon tattoos all slept in the same position in their own unique beds: left sides, left hands slipped under cool pillows, left legs extended toward the ends of the beds, right hands curled under their chins, right knees pulled up at ninety degrees. Each of their unique ceiling fans turning in time. The night slipped over their sleep like a canary’s velvet cover. And in that moment of utter synch, the koi lifted off the man’s thigh, and the dragons churned in the foggy green sky until they found a castle to guard. Until they found a family crest to defend. The koi flopped across the worn wood floors until it found a moat to swim through, and the castle’s habitants looked into the murky water and found a little luck and some courage.

Saturday, August 4, 2012

In Praise of the Mundane

We're deep into summer now, and the iridescent fig beetles will appear in a week to gorge on the overripe fruit. Running lady has grown predictably tan and predictably outpaces me every time I circle the reservoir. The grass grows brown and brittle, and in the afternoons I hide in the shade of a palm tree while Dexter runs through community sprinklers. We punctuate the long, hot days with self-serve frozen yogurt, and reliably the moon comes up behind the hill of houses once the day sweats off its fever. We watch it rise from our chairs around the glass table in the backyard where we drink coconut water and white wine. I've hunkered down into the predictability of existence. Let's praise it. 


Cultivating a love or skill

Let's praise the likelihood that Dexter will ace his preschool skills and transition smoothly into kindergarten, already able to read simple sentences and perform very basic math. Let's assume we'll run into expected disciplinary problems in grade school, and let's expect a few trips to the emergency room for stitches. He'll discover a skill or love and pursue it because that's what we do. Maybe he'll torture us by playing scales on the piano. Maybe he'll need shuttling to swim lessons. Maybe he'll be a math wiz. Let's rightfully figure that middle school will be awkward and painful sometimes, but he'll get through it. We can probably imagine that high school will be both hard and easy, that it could come off without a hitch, that he'll escape unscathed with enough of an education to go to an approved college. We can reasonably expect a part-time job serving burgers at Red Robin or painting houses until graduation. Let's praise the admirable career, even if it misses greatness. Let's cheer for a nice wife and charming kids. Let's weep with gratitude for the boring expectedness of it all. Let's rightly anticipate my son watching me lowered into the ground, and let's suggest he might cry, not because it's tragic, but because he will miss his mother, whose love for him was bottomless. Let's cross our fingers and hope and pray for a simple rolling forward of the years. 

Boy in the Plastic Bubble
Those of us who have had children late in life are accused of helicopter parenting because we keep a watchful, nervous eye on our sons and daughters. If this is true, it may be because we have seen a thing or two in our already long lives that let us know how someone can be fully present one minute and taken away the next. We have been witness to stories of loss, and sometimes those stories are merely once or twice removed from personal experience. Maybe we recognize the ephemeral quality of existence even as we watch our kids swing from the monkey bars. Perhaps we know that parenthood begins and ends with that one little boy panting around the house, pretending to be a dog. Because something bad could happen, and I could go from being a mother to once having been a mother, and that's the saddest narrative I can imagine at this wise and infertile age.
Broken Leg Pouty Face

At fifteen months, Dexter broke his leg. At two, he had a severe allergic reaction. At two and a half, he had a febrile seizure. Add dashes to the timeline of his existence with croup-like coughs, fevers, and the usual bruises. Now, at three, he's had a few incidents that suggest something neurological, but they have been so few as to only be suggestions. And so I watch him closely. This morning he pretended to fall three times in a mock ballet dance. Maybe the other falls were staged, too. Maybe I circle him and whir like the police copters that churn the sky in the high heat of these dependable, ordinary August days. 

Raise your glass of white wine or coconut water with me, dear reader, and let's have a toast for boredom. Cheers to you and your loved ones. 
Never-ending Summer

Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Vainglorious Opinion and How to Avoid It

One more great comic from Toothpaste for Dinner
I am addled with imperfections and riddled with flaws, dear reader, but sometimes I get cocksure about my intellect and wisdom. Luckily for me, though, someone takes me down a notch and reminds me that I, in fact, don't know everything. These humbling experiences make me think further and harder, and let us hope they keep me from becoming an opinionated gasbag...

A friend asked me to read his poetry manuscript and offer some feedback, and I said I would although anyone who has ever done so knows that parsing a manuscript can be laborious. However, this is an old friend whose work I have admired in the past, and here was an opportunity to get yet another opinion on my own belabored manuscript since he agreed to an exchange.

I began reading his manuscript, and I found the poetry difficult. The poems were ciphers in many cases, and I became impatient with their inaccessibility. Then I found myself getting exasperated as I pawed through the poems looking for scraps of narrative, which function for me like yellow brick roads through the difficult terrain of verse. Then I got crabby about my friend's poetry.

What followed was an e-mail exchange that I will paraphrase here in the interest of blog brevity. I wrote to him to say that I was not a good judge of experimental poetry because I'm a slave to the narrative. Then I said that experimental poetry is to blame for alienating the general reading public from poetry as a whole. (I know, right? What a dick.) Then I admitted to intellectual laziness, which did not prevent me from complaining about how I didn't get this or that in his manuscript. My e-mail was not very generous. It was kind of critical in a non-constructive way, in fact.

To paraphrase his reply, he said that he understood if it was not my type of poetry, but he was hoping for some insight into ordering the poems. He said don't worry if you're not moved, but that there is room for all types of poetry. Furthermore, he pointed out that the poems I was most critical of were the ones that were published in their current form, which confirms poetry's "rich diversity" to quote him. He finished by saying that he liked reading to be a process as much as writing and that interpretation was open for debate.

So there you have it, dear reader. I shot my friend down because I didn't get what he was trying to do with his poetry. And his response made me wish I could back-peddle when I'm generally one who will continue to support my opinion. In this case, however, my friend showed me rather quickly that my opinion had no merit. And here's why:

I did to his poetry what I accused his poetry of doing to the reading public, and how can I lament the intellectual laziness of the reading public when I was dismissive of his work because it was too challenging? How absurd and hypocritical. Bad, Sonia, bad.

If I've managed to keep your interest until now, perhaps you can imagine how this post about poetry can be extrapolated to apply to other matters of judgement and taste. Who am I, who is anyone, to judge what one likes and dislikes in matters of the arts? How different we all are, how different are the circumstances of our upbringing, how different is the arrangement of our neurons and synapses, how differently we think, how different are our intellects. Of course there is no accounting for what one appreciates. Furthermore, all sensory and aesthetic experiences are acquired tastes. And my friend is right; there are so many of us out here looking for truth and beauty that there must be room for all of it.

As for judgement, kind reader, we should be more sympathetic to what others love. This is not to say, of course, that all artistic pursuits merit respect. There will always be bad art, music, and poetry, but it's reasonable to say that if an artist, musician, or poet has garnered a following, a contract, a show, or a label, then we must acknowledge that people like it in ways that we will not understand. Therefore, instead of using negative language to disparage, say, contemporary country music or Thomas Kinkade, I will simply say that it's not for me because I'm not really drawn to it.  Moreover, what draws us to an aesthetic, sensory, or intellectual experience is something we're often hardwired with.
If you don't like something, you have the right to avoid it.

Let me disclaim a little bit here when I say that we should not let ourselves off the hook too easily when it comes to matters of intellect and leisurely pursuit. We should not always take the path of least resistance when it comes to how we spend our leisure time, or we risk squandering it. For example, how many episodes of Big Bang Theory can I watch before my eyes glaze over? A richer experience might be worth the extra tender. So, bright reader, go and read a poem. Whatever flavor of verse you prefer. I won't judge.  

As for me, now that I have shamed myself into open-mindedness, I must return to my friend's manuscript because I owe him further commentary. 







  

Friday, July 27, 2012

The Third Behavior: On Breaking Up With Facebook

In my first post for July, I mentioned that I was working on changing three behaviors that had turned into bad habits. The two I had written about were careless eating and drinking, but the post had grown too long to elaborate on the third. As I write about each of these behaviors, I'm confident that it's not just my own dirty laundry I'm airing. I think you, too, dear reader, must share at least one of my questionable habits, and that's why I'm taking the time to spell it all out. It's all in the name of empathy, collective guilt, and rejoicing/self-berating in the joy/pain of too many at-home vodka martinis or whatever the vice. You're welcome to choose an appropriate reaction.

At any rate, I wanted to save the last behavior for its own dedicated post...

About a week or so ago, with the help of my husband, I broke up with Facebook and told it that I only wanted to be friends. I said, "It's not you; it's me." My admission of fault is absolutely true; Facebook has so much to offer in terms of outreach and connection. Nevertheless, it also poses great risks, I think, to individuals like me who communicate best with writing, appreciate wit, struggle with social connection, and succumb to repetitive behaviors and lapses in attention. It seems that each of the things that make Facebook a wonderful place to hang out can be exaggerated so that one becomes a grotesquery, a Facebook troll, and a parody of a Facebooker.

As Facebook functions as a place to write things down to be read in as wide a public setting as we choose based on our number of Facebook friends, it becomes seductive to air thoughts and offer comments or advice. Furthermore, given that Facebook is essentially text-based, I found it tantalizing that I could craft responses and status updates that did not rely on real time. In real time, when someone says something to you, you have x amount of time to respond in a clever or thoughtful fashion whereas on Facebook you can take as much time as you need. You never have to say, "I wish I had thought to say..." or "Why did I say that?..." In this regard, Facebook provides a kind of functionality that appeals to individuals who either communicate best with writing or who like to think before they speak. This becomes grotesque, though, when the individual overspends time crafting responses and status updates to the detriment of spontaneity and face-to-face conversation.

Similarly, Facebook is a great place to work on one-liners. The humor I have regularly seen on Facebook is clever and acerbic. I found myself coming up with one-liners all the time. However, this became grotesque when preoccupation came at the detriment to deeper and longer thought processes. Status updates can not take the place of real work when it comes to writing.

Regarding the social connectivity of Facebook, I have found it both uniting and isolating at the same time. On the one hand, Facebook functions as a digital time machine so that we can move rather fluidly throughout the history of our own lives, connecting and reconnecting with the people who help keep our memories alive. I have had incredibly meaningful interactions with friends from every place I've ever lived. This is why I'm unwilling to abandon it completely. On the other hand, relying solely on Facebook for social interaction is sad. Yet, as a stay-at-home mother whose closest friends live nowhere near Los Angeles, it becomes too easy to revert to introversion and avoid the work required to make new friends in a new town. But how much meaning and depth can be milked from the fly-by-night, brief interactions that Facebook affords? Sitting alone in one's underwear in front of the computer, no matter how many Facebook friends you have, does not a social life make.

Those brief interactions and bits of approval that we get from Facebook are what causes the most trouble, though. We get caught in a hunger for feedback, which leads to repetitive checking and posting. I found I had become stricken with borderline OCD. This is not a joke. Furthermore, the preoccupation of the feedback loop affected my ability to concentrate. It also affected my parenting. When checking Facebook became more important than spending time with my one and only beautiful son, it was time to dump it, or to at least establish a healthy distance. I don't want to look back at Dexter's childhood and think, "If only I had paid attention to my boy instead of chortling about political memes that over-utilized pictures of Gene Wilder as Willie Wonka."

Like anything else, moderation is key. If you can drink your one glass of red wine each night for health purposes, good on ya. If you can log into Facebook once every couple of days to time travel, I commend your restraint. For the rest of us, though, us bacchanalians who would turn our teeth purple with Cabernet with even the slightest provocation, we need to proceed with extreme caution. In fact, sometimes we even have to relinquish our log-in passwords to spouses even if we hate to create a power play like that in our relationships. Although sometimes our spouses are really kind and sympathetic, too.

Monday, July 23, 2012

Poetic Interlude

Febrile

He seized on the interchange
as late sunlight glared off game-day traffic
and I just stopped, mid-lane,
and punched the hazards
as he bucked against the car seat.
But I wouldn't say I watched, couldn't say
I stared, won't say now I saw
when his mouth went slack
and his eyes rolled white
as if I could have recorded
those sights. And today his fever
lingers on his face the way
Vermeer's light loved milkmaids.
His brown eyes brimming like a heifer’s;
His beauty like a doomed
consumptive. He clings like August
clutches the Valley, and I sit
and let my own sweat rise.
How could I do otherwise?
In two days he’ll push away my arms,
so I hold this moment in my gaze
the way I spot heat mirages
wavering off the asphalt.